Man on the moon

If you believed they put a man on the moon
Man on the moon
If you believe there’s nothing up his sleeve
Then nothing is cool
–REM/Man On The Moon

Johnny take a walk with your sister the moon
Let her pale light in to fill up your room
–U2/Mysterious Ways

This is a pretty much verbatim transcription of what went through my head on the way to work this morning when REM and U2 played back to back and the moon set behind me.

I do believe we put a man on the moon, but I don’t really believe in a man in the moon. I like to tell myself there is though. Well, not a man. A woman. Why would it be a man, when the moon is so clearly female in all of her aspects?
Waxing and waning, as tidal and cyclical as any Earthbound woman. And you know what waxing and waning are, right? Her size changes throughout the month. C’mon. If the moon wore pants, at certain times of the month they might have an elastic waist. Female, clearly.

Nonbelievers like a flight of fancy as much as anyone. Maybe even more. We don’t have all that fantasy and magic making up a religious life, so maybe it leaks out in other ways. Like wondering if the man in the moon is a woman, and what she thinks when she looks down here.

I wonder where the moon is? Is it following me like it did when I was a kid? It seems like it did that more often then. We should pay more attention…it was always cool having the moon follow the car.

She’s up there, mixing us all up. Making us a little crazy.
A little?!?

There’s a reason they call us lunatics.
Do I need to explain that luna and moon are the same thing? Non word-lovers might not get that.

Word lovers might think it’s silly to explain.

Everyone knows that lunacy and the moon are connected because the words are related yeah? Or is it that the words became related because the moon caused so much lunacy? I don’t even play an etymologist on TV so how would I know?

By the way, if you put an N and extra O in etymologist, it becomes a person who knows all about insects instead of a person who knows all about words. Say NO to bugs.

I wonder if I’d have liked Andy Kaufman more if I’d been older when he started in on the wrestling. I never got it. Maybe I would have gotten it if I was older and weirder.

I should write this down.

Done.

The sound of silence

If I put my hand up and blow a kiss,
it’ll never make it to you.
It’ll go down over Kansas like Icarus,
sink like Amelia’s last SOS.
–McKinley/Icarus Over Kansas

Most days, I wake up with a song running through my head. Often it’s just a line from a song. It’s a different song each day, usually. Some days, one gets stuck there for a few days, and I start listening to what it is trying to tell me. Usually, a song is like Freud’s cigar. Just a cigar. By the time I get to work, the song has disappeared. When the same one comes back several mornings in a row, or when it sticks around all day, maybe the cigar is a sign that there may be something more complex going on.

Oh, I know. Everything is a complex with me. I know. I know. Believe me, I know.

When this particular song got stuck in my head, I didn’t have to think too hard about it. I know exactly why it’s in my head. It’s because I’m trying to communicate with someone with a very different communication style than mine and I’m frustrated. Sometimes that’s just how it is with certain people. If you are like me, you turn it over in your head and try to make sense of it. It’s particularly challenging for me if the problem is a lack of response. I have a hard time talking in the first place. If someone doesn’t respond, it leaves too much room for my sick inner core to interpret the silence. Sick inner cores never interpret a silence in a positive way, either. They’re rat bastards.

The trouble is, if you’re a neurotic and over-analytical person with not a lot of self-confidence and a really good imagination, you can spin a silence in all kinds of ways. Some of them may even be accurate. The trouble is, with a silent person you never really know. It’s utterly pointless to try to figure out why someone isn’t talking. Only they know. So I make all sorts of valiant efforts to mindfully yank my brain back to the present when I catch myself at it, but it’s a lot of work. Plus, honestly, I kind of like inventing the theories. It’s fun in a self-defeating sort of way. That may be part of the reason I’m writing so much. It distracts me from imagining all sorts of theoreticals. I do it for everything. It’s a disease, I’m sure.

This is what my brain looks like on hyper-speculation overload. You may need to avert your eyes if it gets too graphic:

Maybe you talk too much so they stop answering because you need to just shut up.
Maybe they don’t stop answering because you talk too much, maybe they just need to process things more slowly than you do.
Maybe they don’t care about it enough to answer.
Maybe they do, but they are the kind of person who is uncomfortable talking about…anything.
Maybe what you’re saying is boring.
Maybe they don’t know how to tell you to change the subject so they’re just ignoring you until you go away.
Maybe they didn’t get your message.
Maybe they’ve already told you what they think a MILLION TIMES.
Maybe they died.
Maybe they are a dick.
Maybe they are busy.
Maybe they have a very ill child who requires all of their attention right now.
Maybe they had a stroke, and would love to reply and can’t because they can’t type or talk any more.
Maybe they’ve been kidnapped by aliens or Somali pirates.
Maybe they think they already answered.
Maybe they are embarrassed because they waited so long to answer.
Maybe they hate you.
Maybe their spouse deleted all the messages on their account and they don’t know you’ve written.
Maybe they ignore all first messages and only answer if someone sends another because they are creeps.
Maybe you should just take a deep breath and get a life, because you are worrying about this WAY too much!

I can do this on an Infinite Maybe Loop if I don’t stop it. When I stop it, it leaks out in songs ear-wormed in my brain. This is one of the downsides to creativity that people don’t talk about. I also have a special gift for imagining conversations that will never happen. Maybe I was meant to be a playwright or screenwriter.

So, if you care about me at all, don’t stop responding to my calls/texts/emails and the like without letting me know why. It makes me strain my assumption and speculation muscles, and they’re over-worked as it is. When someone is also prone to taking things personally, as outlined previously, it can potentially result in temporary insanity. Or permanent inanity. Either way. It might be a simple as “hey, I need to think about that, or “this is uncomfortable for me, can we talk about something else?” At work, “I need to check a few things and get back to you” is an option.

Or even “fuck off, psycho.” I’m flexible. Please note that “fuck off, psycho” is not recommended if you are a co-worker wondering how to communicate effectively with me. Try “screw you, nutcase” instead. Human Resources would probably find that a preferable term.

There are a lot of reasons words might just fall flat. I try to keep in mind that there might be perfectly innocuous reasons for it, but really? Most of them point at me, rather than the non-responder. Generally speaking, if someone wants to respond or if it benefits them, they will. If they don’t want to, they will not.

So then what? That’s the part I don’t quite know what to do with.

There’s something about what I’m saying that someone either doesn’t want to respond to or can’t bring themself to for whatever reason. What do you do about that when it happens? Mostly what I do is try to do nothing and then either try again, let it drop, or get annoyed and blow up. That doesn’t work very well, and I am not quite psycho enough to keep trying the same thing over and over when it doesn’t work.

So. Yeah.

When the desired level of communication is so drastically different, can that be fixed?
Maybe not.

There’s got to be at least a little bit of cooperation in order for people to get along.

I have many questions.
Not so many solutions.

None that are collaborative, which would be ideal.
Much like not taking shit personally, you can’t make people behave the way you want them to unless you’ve got some sort of motivating hook.

Maybe ice cream or coffee would work.

There is no spoon. I mean there is no true or false.

Time to change has come and gone
Watched your fears become your god
It’s your decision, it’s your decision
–Alice In Chains/Your Decision

Recently I was having a discussion with someone who doesn’t know me well. He insisted that I see everything as black or white, which makes me decide things impetuously. It made me laugh, because it’s so wrong. In fact, the opposite is a little more true–I’m more prone to over-analyze than under-analyze. In either case, I am actually pretty good at making decisions most of the time, but if the decision is TOO simple, sometimes I find it weirdly difficult. One thing that always trips me up is a true/false question on a test. It’s just too artificially black and white, and I can always see a little gray peeking around the edges.

This is me taking a true/false test. Nothing easier, right?
Wrong.

Question 1. Oh, that’s easy.
True.

No, wait. In certain situations that almost never occur, it’s false

Scribble scribble scratch.
False.

Do you suppose the instructor knew about that when she wrote the exam? Maybe she meant under normal circumstances. It’s almost impossible for it to ever actually happen. We didn’t talk about the exceptions in class. Shoot. I don’t know.

Scratch scratch scribble
True.

But, still. What about that very rare thing that only happens when there is a total eclipse of the sun when Christmas falls on Tuesday during a leap year? It does technically make the answer false and it was in one of the text books on a page that wasn’t assigned reading.
Sigh.

Maybe I should write a brief explanatory essay response about why I think this is both true and false. Hmm.

Yeah.
That’s what I’ll do.

Scribble scribble scribble.

Dumbass.

If you think I’m kidding, or exaggerating, you are incorrect. I have actually done this on every true/false test I’ve ever taken that wasn’t on one of those scantron forms with the bubbles you fill in with a pencil. Those forms are anathema to me. They forced me to pick a specific answer without putting in an explanatory comment. Questions and answers are not meant to be put in a box. Questions and answered are meant to be…questioned more than answered.

True or false:
Michelle thinks too much.

True.

No, wait.
False.

At least I already wrote the explanatory comment.